I do basic check-ups all the time, when patients ask for one when and I think they are sensibly clinically. Today I received a report on a check up a patient of mine had gone through elsewhere. In addition to the routine history taking, physical examination, blood tests, chest x-ray and ECG, he had had an ultrasound examination of the abdomen (to exclude an aortic aneurysm) and pelvis (to exclude prostatic abnormalities), an echocardiogram (to exclude structure and functional abnormalities of his heart) an MRI virtual colonoscopy (to exclude polyps and cancers), MRI Tomography scan of the head (to look at the brain and the arterial system and the sinuses) and MRI Tomography scan of the heart (to look at the heard and the major arterial branches).
A comprehensive check-up of this nature will have cost a fortune but he obviously considered that it was worth it. Like it or not, there are some clinical conditions that can be picked up only on specific tests and they can be devastating if they are missed. On the other hand, one has to bear in mind the possible risks of each test and also the fact that the only test that is absolutely accurate is post-mortem examination. Also we should beware of creating neuroses in people who are perfectly healthy.
Clearly, doctors have to make judgements, within financial constraints and in considering the availability of diagnostic facilities and also through using clinical common sense. But this patient made the judgement for himself. This is his privilege because of his financial status. In time, the cost of the tests will come down, the procedures will become more accurate and the risks less significant. The concept of a check-up is sensible. The extent and the timing and frequency are debatable but even they can be judged more or less appropriately. Anyway, it’s the way things are going.